An independent evaluation guide · Built around trust, privacy, and therapist review

A private-practice evaluation guide

Protect the room.
Lighten the paperwork.

A therapist-centered guide to evaluating AI scribe workflows, consent, privacy, and note review. Evaluate the full workflow before a microphone enters the room.

Start the evaluation →Read the privacy questions

SESSION / REVIEW MAP

  1. BeforeExplain the workflowConsent or notice · decline path
  2. DuringProtect presencePause · minimum necessary capture
  3. AfterTherapist authorshipReview · correct · finalize
“A good scribe should make the technology quieter—not the therapeutic relationship.”
Blank paper, pencil, and a quiet therapy-practice review setting
THE QUIET-TOOL PRINCIPLE

Technology should leave room for attention, consent, correction, and the therapist’s own voice.

WHAT WE LOOK FOR

01

Trust survives the workflow

Clients understand what happens and can decline without friction.

02

Privacy is specific

Audio, transcript, output, vendors, retention, and deletion are visible.

03

The therapist remains the author

No generated note becomes a record without deliberate review.

THE PRACTICE JOURNAL

Guides for the questions demos skip.

01
EvaluationChoosing an AI scribe for therapy: 14 questions before a trial

A worksheet for data handling, consent, note quality, and therapeutic fit.

12 min ↗02
TrustClient consent and disclosure for AI-assisted therapy notes

A conversation framework to adapt with legal and ethical guidance.

9 min ↗03
Note reviewReviewing AI-generated therapy notes: a 10-point correction pass

A deliberate check for accuracy, inference, tone, privacy, and the record.

8 min ↗